[AI-GOV]
AI Governance
Governance frameworks for systems that make decisions on their own. We treat this as an access-control problem: what a model is allowed to touch, who signs off before it acts, and what gets logged when it does.
- Model risk assessment
- Guardrail & policy design
- Human-in-the-loop controls
- Audit trail & explainability review
- Proposedmodel output flagged for review
- Guardrail checkpolicy engine evaluates scope
- Human sign-offaccountable owner approves or blocks
- Loggeddecision + rationale retained
[FAQ]
Frequently asked
- What does PAFTAK's AI governance engagement include?
- Model risk assessment, guardrail & policy design, human-in-the-loop controls, and audit trail & explainability review.
- How does PAFTAK think about AI governance?
- As an access-control problem: what a model is allowed to touch, who signs off before it acts, and what gets logged when it does — the same discipline PAFTAK applies to IAM and PAM.
- Does PAFTAK's AI governance approach require a human in the loop?
- Yes — flagged model output goes through a guardrail check and then a human sign-off, where an accountable owner approves or blocks the action, before it's logged with its decision and rationale.
- Is PAFTAK based in Alberta?
- Yes — PAFTAK Software Inc. is an Alberta, Canada consultancy taking enterprise engagements worldwide.